简体中文 繁体中文 English
View: 179|Reply: 4

[玩家交流] Dear Navyfield team // 親愛的Navyfield團隊

[Copy link]
累计签到:24 Days
连续签到:1 Days

11

Threads

0

Followers

62

Credits

Rank: 3Rank: 3

下士

Post time 2019-6-11 11:44 | Show all posts |Read mode
Dear Navyfield team,

I'm writing on behalf
of a large part of the Latino community and part of the foreign community (Americans and some Europeans), with
many players enjoying Navyfield from the first beta version on
2004, and logically with great fidelity to the game, considered by the
most of us, like the best game of its kind. The main goal
of this communication is to convey our great concern about the future
of Harbor Assault (HA), considering the attitude of several teams involved
in this competition.


In fact, in the past
months and with the different fleets that we have faced, many of
they made the decision not to give any defense of their ports (using 2 or
3 boats to defend a port against 30 or more players from us, which
perfectly could be considered as a lack of respect, considering that
the organization of an attack implies time to make the coordination
adequate). Unfortunately, this is currently a type of trend (it is very
difficult to think that we are facing a kind of coincidence), because it is not a
isolated incident. We perceive, logically, that the attack in HA is more fun than
the action of defending the port, and that could be a bad incentive for many
fleets The danger of this situation for the future of HA is that if many
fleets do not adequately defend their ports, it could perfectly
generate a clear disincentive for any attacking fleet, then the
HA attraction could be seriously damaged, and as a consequence, generates a
Damage also to the equipment environment.
On the other hand, and considering
the first problem described, we believe that the defense fleet could receive
some prize perfectly, depending on the time that is successfully defended in
some specific port




We respectfully want to make a proposal
of some prize / penalty, aimed at the defense fleets with the
goal of maintaining a healthy game at Harbor Assault. Our proposal
is the next:







1) Penalty in case of non-defense
for any fleet:

to. First, define a minimum number of
players in the room with a maximum limit of 2 minutes after starting the
game. Maybe 15, 20, 25? This minimum number must be reached by the fleet
of defenders, in case it is not achieved, the attacking fleet will gain the port
immediately.





b. Yes
a fleet does not reach this minimum number, or does not make any defense (which
can report with a video, in case of a non-sporting behavior) by
first time after this rule is applied, the fleet will receive a week
of suspension.




c. For the second time, the fleet
Defender will receive one month of suspension.




d. For the third time, the fleet
of defenders will receive six months of suspension.




and. More than 3 times, the fleet
of defenders will be suspended forever.




F. Logically, by
transparency with the NF Universe, the status of suspended fleets should
published on the NF website, as this information could clearly be
strategic within each fleet in the sense of convincing its players
to avoid losing ports with penalties.



2) Prizes for fleets
successful in defense (being very honest, we do not remember if there are currently
A system of rewards for defending fleets HA is available, if this system
is available, we do not know if we deserve any prize for successfully defending
long periods in some months ago):




to. After a month of
successful defense (approximately 4 HA), grant 3 Premium accounts of 1 month of
duration randomly among the players who achieved during the period,
participation in at least 75% of the HA time (this is to ensure that
the majority of the defenders remain every weekend playing in the HA).




b. 2 months of defense
successful, 3 BB / CV 6.5 to be distributed using the same criteria
previous




c. 3 months of defense
successful, 3 BB / CV 7 to be distributed using the same criteria
previous










By
Of course, we believe that this type of incentive could transform the HA event into
a really challenging part of the game and could make the fleets
strong to have a good competition.



We hope that our
suggestion makes sense to you and, please, we want to know your opinions
about.



Best regards,



親愛的Navyfield團隊,

我是代表寫的
大部分拉丁裔社區和部分外國社區(美國人和一些歐洲人),與
許多玩家從第一個測試版上享受Navyfield
2004年,在邏輯上非常忠誠於遊戲,被認為是
我們大多數人,就像最好的同類游戲。主要目標
這種溝通是為了表達我們對未來的極大關注
考慮到所涉及的幾個團隊的態度,考慮到港口突擊(HA)
在這場比賽中。


實際上,在過去
幾個月以及我們面對的不同艦隊,很多
他們決定不對他們的港口進行任何辯護(使用2或者
3艘船來防禦我們30名或更多玩家的港口,其中
考慮到這一點,完全可以被視為缺乏尊重
攻擊的組織意味著有時間進行協調
適當)。不幸的是,這是目前的一種趨勢(它非常
很難想像我們正面臨一種巧合),因為它不是一個
完成孤立。從邏輯上講,我們認為HA中的攻擊更有趣
捍衛港口的行動,這對許多人來說可能是一個不好的誘因
艦隊。這種情況對醫管局未來的危險在於,如果很多
艦隊沒有充分保衛他們的港口,它可以完美
對任何攻擊艦隊產生明顯的抑制因素,然後是
HA的吸引力可能會嚴重受損,因此會產生影響
對設備環境也造成損害。
另一方面,並考慮
所描述的第一個問題,我們認為國防艦隊可以接收
一些獎品完美,取決於成功防守的時間
一些特定的端口




我們恭敬地想提出一個提案
一些獎金/罰款,針對國防隊
在Harbour Assault維持健康比賽的目標。我們的建議
它是以下內容:







1)非防守時的處罰
對於任何車隊:

一。首先,定義最小數量
在開始後最多限時2分鐘的房間裡的球員
遊戲。也許15,20,25?車隊必須達到這個最小數量
對於防守者來說,如果沒有實現,攻擊艦隊將獲得該港口
馬上。





灣如果
艦隊沒有達到這個最低數量,或者沒有做出任何防禦(哪個
可以報告視頻,如果是非體育行為)
應用此規則後,船隊將首次獲得一周的時間
暫停




溫度。第二次,艦隊
後衛將獲得一個月的停賽。




d。第三次,艦隊
維權者將獲得六個月的停職。




即超過3次,艦隊
維權者將永遠被停職。




F。邏輯上,通過
與NF宇宙的透明度,懸浮艦隊的狀態應該
發佈在NF網站上,因為這些信息顯然可以
在說服其球員的意義上,每個車隊都具有戰略意義
避免因處罰而丟失港口。



2)車隊獎
成功防守(非常誠實,我們不記得目前是否存在
如果這個系統,可以使用一個獎勵艦隊HA的獎勵系統
我們不知道我們是否應該獲得成功衛冕的獎勵
幾個月前的長期):




一。一個月後
成功防禦(約4 HA),授予3個1個月的高級賬戶
在此期間取得的球員之間隨機的持續時間,
參與至少75%的HA時間(這是為了確保
大多數維權者每個週末都在HA中打球。




灣2個月的防守
成功,3 BB / CV 6.5使用相同的標准進行分發
以上。




溫度。 3個月的防守
成功,3 BB / CV 7使用相同的標準分發
以上。











當然,我們認為這種激勵措施可以將HA事件轉變為
這是一個真正具有挑戰性的遊戲部分,可以成為艦隊的一部分
有良好的競爭力。



我們希望我們的
建議對你有意義,請,我們想知道你的意見
關於它



最好的問候,


不造谣,不传谣,不带负能量节奏,积极传递正能量,理性交流做一个有素质有教养的酷派玩家。
累计签到:3 Days
连续签到:1 Days

0

Threads

0

Followers

80

Credits

Rank: 3Rank: 3

下士

Post time 2019-6-11 13:08 该帖发送自手机浏览器 | Show all posts
Good suggestion. Good to know about people  interested of the Health of this Community ! Beso regards!
不造谣,不传谣,不带负能量节奏,积极传递正能量,理性交流做一个有素质有教养的酷派玩家。
累计签到:4 Days
连续签到:1 Days

2

Threads

0

Followers

108

Credits

Rank: 3Rank: 3

下士

Post time 2019-6-11 17:44 该帖发送自手机浏览器 | Show all posts
And so it should be, to give more entertainment to the game and please put good burn ..%
不造谣,不传谣,不带负能量节奏,积极传递正能量,理性交流做一个有素质有教养的酷派玩家。
累计签到:154 Days
连续签到:24 Days

4

Threads

0

Followers

178

Credits

Rank: 4

中士

活跃之星活跃会员论坛保卫者论坛之星新人进步奖

Post time 2019-6-11 19:42 | Show all posts
非常好,很有建设性,部分奖励需要详细讨论!欢迎你们来攻击樱花港!
舰队使命玩家!!!!!

尚未签到

0

Threads

0

Followers

41

Credits

Rank: 2

上等兵

Post time 2019-6-11 21:03 该帖发送自手机浏览器 | Show all posts
do something because if you are not going to lose many players, and the people are discouraged, apart, one as a fleet has to organize days before a harbor, to find 3 dying battleships
不造谣,不传谣,不带负能量节奏,积极传递正能量,理性交流做一个有素质有教养的酷派玩家。
You have to log in before you can reply Login | 注册通行证账号 Register

Points Rules

QQ|手机版|黑屋|Archiver|版权声明|酷派天空KupaiSky ( 最终解释权归 HONGKONG KUPAISKY LIMITED 所有 皖B2-20160009-2 皖网文〔2018〕5099-101号 )

2019-6-17 03:59 GMT+8 , Processed in 0.626978 second(s), 51 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4
© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list